Curse

bill753 · Dec 26, 2005, 04:59 PM // 16:59

I thought of a cool new warrior enchantment. It would go along these lines:

"As long as you maintain this enchantment, each point of adrenaline you receive makes you attack (2-5%) faster. The duration of each adrenaline point's speed increase lasts as long as normal unused adrenaline skills."

I expect it would have tactics or strength as its attribute.

Whad'ye think?

Edit: As far as I know something like this doesn't exist, nor has been thought of by someone, but if I'm wrong I'm sorry.

Lexar · Dec 26, 2005, 10:18 PM // 22:18

Would have to be elite, and tactics, since strength already has a few skills comparable to this like battle rage and warrriors endurance. But sure, I wouldn't mind a skill like this.

However, if it would be for a warrior, it would be better if this is a stance instead of an enchantment. If people run around enchanted like this and have a stance they'd be ubnstoppable.

Age · Dec 27, 2005, 12:43 AM // 00:43

Then agian one easy strip enchantment spell could remove it.

Plague · Dec 27, 2005, 12:55 AM // 00:55

Adrenaline strikes last a long time. You gain a strike of adrenaline for every hit, and even incurring damage. You gain adrenaline faster the faster you attack.

What you're suggesting would cause a warrior to cap out at 133% attack speed in a matter of seconds, and stay that way until he either dies or his opponent die.

So... no. Try this:

"As long as you maintain this enchantment, target ally attacks 2...5% faster but deals 10...1% less damage in melee."

Guardian of the Light · Dec 27, 2005, 02:01 AM // 02:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Age

Then agian one easy strip enchantment spell could remove it.

Same with IW yet its elite.

Lampshade · Dec 27, 2005, 02:57 AM // 02:57

Quote:

What you're suggesting would cause a warrior to cap out at 133% attack speed in a matter of seconds, and stay that way until he either dies or his opponent die.

So... no. Try this

Quote for Truth.

Yanman.be · Dec 27, 2005, 08:40 AM // 08:40

cap is 150%...
it has gone from 166 to 150..

iway + tf ftw

Leonof · Dec 27, 2005, 10:30 AM // 10:30

It should be a stance then. Warriors aren't really spellcasters so enchantment doesn't seem right, same as rangers. As a stance it wouldn't be that overpowered, it would be a nice skill and it wouldn't really be all that hard to counter.

bill753 · Dec 27, 2005, 01:46 PM // 13:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leonof

It should be a stance then. Warriors aren't really spellcasters so enchantment doesn't seem right, same as rangers. As a stance it wouldn't be that overpowered, it would be a nice skill and it wouldn't really be all that hard to counter.

Yeah. Maybe you could add a 'this ends if you use a skill' clause in there too.